Peritoneal Dialysis Technique Survival: A Cohort Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Reasons for transfer from peritoneal dialysis (PD) to hemodialysis (HD) remain incompletely understood. Among incident and prevalent patients receiving PD, we evaluated the association between prior treatment with HD and PD technique survival. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults who initiated PD at a Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI) outpatient facility between January 1, 2010 and September 30, 2019. EXPOSURES: The primary exposure of interest was timing of PD start, categorized as PD-first, PD-early, or PD-late. Other covariates included demographics, clinical characteristics, and routine laboratory results. OUTCOMES: Modality switch from PD to HD sustained for more than 90 days. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multivariable Fine-Gray models with competing risks and time-varying covariates, stratified at 9 months to account for lack of proportionality. RESULTS: Among 5224 patients who initiated PD at a DCI facility, 3174 initiated dialysis with PD ("PD-first"), 942 transitioned from HD to PD within 90 days ("PD-early"), and 1108 transitioned beyond 90 days ("PD-late"); 1472 (28%) subsequently transferred from PD to HD. PD-early and PD-late patients had higher risk of transfer to HD as compared to PD-first patients [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.51 (95% CI: 1.17-1.96) and 2.41 (1.94-3.00), respectively, in the first 9 months and aHR 1.16 (0.99-1.35) and 1.43 (1.24-1.65), respectively, after 9 months]. More peritonitis episodes, fewer home visits, lower serum albumin, lower residual kidney function, and lower peritoneal clearance calculated with weekly Kt/V were additional risk factors for PD-to-HD transfer. LIMITATIONS: Missing data on dialysis adequacy and residual kidney function, confounded by short PD technique survival. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating dialysis with PD is associated with greater PD technique survival, though many of those who initiate PD late in their dialysis course still experience substantial time on PD. Peritonitis, lower serum albumin, and lower Kt/V are risk factors for PD-to-HD transfer that may be amenable to intervention.

Dialysate Sodium Lowering in Maintenance Hemodialysis A Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Lowering dialysate sodium may improve volume and blood pressure control in maintenance hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We randomized 42 participants 2:1 to dialysate sodium 135 vs. 138 mEq/L for 6 months. This was followed by a 12 week extension in which sodium was increased to 140 mEq/L in low arm participants. The primary outcome was intradialytic hypotension (IDH). Secondary outcomes included dialysis disequilibrium symptoms, ER visits/hospitalizations, interdialytic weight gain, blood pressure (BP). Longitudinal changes across arms were analyzed using linear mixed regression. RESULTS: Treatment to dialysate sodium 135 vs. 138 mEq/L was not associated with a difference in a change in the rate of IDH (mean change (95%CI) 2.8 (0.8,9.5) vs. 2.7 (1.1, 6.2) events per 100 treatments per month; ratio of slopes 0.96(0.26,3.61) or ER visits/hospitalizations (7.3 (2.3, 12.4) vs. 6.7 (2.9, 10.6) events per 100 patient months; difference 0.6(-6.9,5.8). Symptom score was unchanged in the 135 mEq/L arm (0.7 (-1.4,2.7) and decreased in the 138 mEq/l arm (5.0,8.5,2.0); difference 6.0 (2.1,9.8)). Interdialytic weight gain declined in the 135 mEq/L arm and was unchanged in the 138 mEq/L arm,(-0.3(-0.5,0.0) vs. 0.3 (0.0, 0.6) kg over 6 months; difference (-0.6 (-0.1,-1.0) kg). In the extension phase, raising dialysate sodium from 135 to 140 mEq/L was associated with an increase in interdialytic weight gain (0.2 (0.1, 0.3) kg), predialysis BP (7.0 (4.8, 9.2)/ 3.9 (2.6, 5.1) mm Hg) and a reduction in IDH [OR 0.66 (0.45, 0.97)]. CONCLUSION: Use of a dialysate sodium of 135 as compared with 138 mEq/L was associated with a small reduction in interdialytic weight gain without impact on IDH or predialysis BP, but with an increase in symptoms. Raising dialysate sodium from 135 to 140mEq/L was associated with a reduction in IDH, a small increase in interdialytic weight gain and a marked increase in predialysis BP.

Serial SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Titers in Vaccinated Dialysis Patients: Prevalence of Unrecognized Infection and Duration of Seroresponse.

Rationale & Objective: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections are likely underdiagnosed, but the degree of underdiagnosis among patients receiving maintenance dialysis is unknown. The durability of the immune response after the third vaccine dose in this population also remains uncertain. This descriptive study tracked antibody levels to (1) assess the rate of undiagnosed infections and (2) characterize seroresponse durability after the third dose. Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting & Participants: SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated patients receiving maintenance dialysis through a national dialysis provider. Immunoglobulin G spike antibodies [anti-spike immunoglobulin (Ig) G] titers were assessed monthly after vaccination. Exposures: Two and 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Outcomes: Undiagnosed and diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections; anti-spike IgG titers over time. Analytical Approach: Undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified as an increase in anti-spike IgG titer of ≥100 BAU/mL, not associated with receipt of vaccine or diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection (by polymerase chain reaction test or antigen test). In descriptive analyses, anti-spike IgG titers were followed over time. Results: Among 2,703 patients without previous coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received an initial 2-dose vaccine series, 271 had diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections (3.4 per 10,000 patient-days) and 129 had undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections (1.6 per 10,000 patient-days). Among 1,894 patients without previous COVID-19 who received a third vaccine dose, 316 had diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections (7.0 per 10,000 patient-days) and 173 had undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections (3.8 per 10,000 patient-days). In both cohorts, anti-spike IgG levels declined over time. Of the initial 2-dose cohort, 66% had a titer of ≥500 BAU/mL in the first month, with 24% maintaining a titer of ≥500 BAU/mL at 6 months. Of the third dose cohort, 95% had a titer of ≥500 BAU/mL in the first month after the third dose, with 77% maintaining a titer of ≥500 BAU/mL at 6 months. Limitations: The assays used had upper limits. Conclusions: Among patients receiving maintenance dialysis, about 1 in every 3 SARS-CoV-2 infections was undiagnosed. Given this population's vulnerability to COVID-19, ongoing infection control measures are needed. A 3-dose primary mRNA vaccine series optimizes seroresponse rate and durability. Plain-Language Summary: Patients receiving maintenance dialysis have been particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. Using serially measured antibodies, we found that a substantial proportion (about one-third) of SARS-CoV-2 infections among this population had been missed, both among those who had completed a 2-dose vaccine series and among those who had received a third vaccine dose. Such missed infections likely had only mild or minimal symptoms, but this failure to recognize all infections is concerning. Furthermore, vaccines have been effective among patients receiving dialysis, but our study additionally shows that the immune response wanes over time, even after a third dose. There is therefore a role for ongoing vigilance against this highly transmissible infection.

Serial SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers in vaccinated dialysis patients: prevalence of unrecognized infection and duration of seroresponse.

Rationale & Objective: SARS-CoV-2 infections are likely underdiagnosed, but the degree of underdiagnosis among maintenance dialysis patients is unknown. Durability of the immune response after third vaccine doses in this population also remains uncertain. This study tracked antibody levels to 1) assess the rate of undiagnosed infections and 2) characterize seroresponse durability after third doses. Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting & Participants: SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated patients receiving maintenance dialysis through a national dialysis provider. Immunoglobulin G spike antibodies (anti-spike IgG) titers were assessed monthly following vaccination. Exposures: Two and three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Outcomes: Undiagnosed and diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections; anti-spike IgG titers over time. Analytical Approach: "Undiagnosed" SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified as an increase in anti-spike IgG titer of ≥ 100 BAU/mL, not associated with receipt of vaccine or "diagnosed" SARS-CoV-2 infection (by PCR or antigen test). In descriptive analyses, anti-spike IgG titers were followed over time. Results: Among 2660 patients without prior COVID-19 who received an initial two-dose vaccine series, 371 (76%) SARS-CoV-2 infections were diagnosed and 115 (24%) were undiagnosed. Among 1717 patients without prior COVID-19 who received a third vaccine dose, 155 (80%) SARS-CoV-2 infections were diagnosed and 39 (20%) were undiagnosed. In both cohorts, anti-spike IgG levels declined over time. Of the initial two-dose cohort, 66% had a titer ≥ 500 BAU/mL in the first month, with 23% maintaining a titer ≥ 500 BAU/mL at six months. Of the third dose cohort, 95% had a titer ≥ 500 BAU/mL in the first month after the third dose, with 76% maintaining a titer ≥ 500 BAU/mL at six months. Limitations: Assays used had upper limits. Conclusions: Among maintenance dialysis patients, 20-24% of SARS-CoV-2 infections were undiagnosed. Given this population's vulnerability to COVID-19, ongoing infection control measures are needed. A three-dose primary mRNA vaccine series optimizes seroresponse rate and durability.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Effectiveness and Breakthrough Infections Among Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness and immunogenicity threshold associated with protection against COVID-19-related hospitalization or death in the dialysis population are unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients without COVID-19 history receiving maintenance dialysis through a national dialysis provider and treated between February 1 and December 18, 2021, with follow-up through January 17, 2022. PREDICTOR: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status. OUTCOMES: All SARS-CoV-2 infections, composite of hospitalization or death following COVID-19. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Logistic regression was used to determine COVID-19 case rates and vaccine effectiveness. RESULTS: Of 16,213 patients receiving dialysis during the study period, 12,278 (76%) were fully vaccinated, 589 (4%) were partially vaccinated, and 3,346 (21%) were unvaccinated by the end of follow-up. Of 1,225 COVID-19 cases identified, 550 (45%) occurred in unvaccinated patients, and 891 (73%) occurred during the Delta variant-dominant period. Between the pre-Delta period and the Delta-dominant period, vaccine effectiveness rates against a severe COVID-19-related event (hospitalization or death) were 84% and 70%, respectively. In the subset of 3,202 vaccinated patients with at least one anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) assessment, lower anti-spike IgG levels were associated with higher case rates per 10,000 days and higher adjusted hazard ratios for infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization or death. LIMITATIONS: Observational design, residual biases, and confounding may exist. CONCLUSIONS: Among maintenance dialysis patients, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 diagnosis and associated hospitalization or death. Among vaccinated patients, a low anti-spike IgG level is associated with worse COVID-19-related outcomes.

Seroresponse to Inactivated and Recombinant Influenza Vaccines Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: High-dose influenza vaccine provides better protection against influenza infection in older adults than standard-dose vaccine. We compared vaccine seroresponse among hemodialysis patients over a period of 4 months after administration of high-dose trivalent inactivated (HD-IIV3), standard-dose quadrivalent inactivated (SD-IIV4), or quadrivalent recombinant quadrivalent (RIV4) influenza vaccine. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients at 4 hemodialysis clinics who received influenza vaccine. EXPOSURE: Type of influenza vaccine. OUTCOME: Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers were measured at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months after vaccination. The primary outcome was seroprotection rates at HI titers of at least 1:40 and at least 1:160 (antibody levels providing protection from infection in approximately 50% and 95% of immunocompetent individuals, respectively) at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months after vaccination. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We calculated geometric mean titer as well as seroprotection and seroconversion rates. Adjusted generalized linear models with additional trend analyses were performed to evaluate the association between vaccine type and outcomes. RESULTS: 254 hemodialysis patients were vaccinated against influenza with HD-IIV3 (n = 141), SD-IIV4 (n = 36), or RIV4 (n = 77). A robust initial seroresponse to influenza A strains was observed after all 3 vaccines. Geometric mean titer and seroprotection (HI titer ≥1:160) rates against influenza A strains were higher and more sustained with HD-IIV3 than SD-IIV4 or RIV4. More than 80% of patients vaccinated with HD-IIV3 were seroprotected (HI titer ≥1:160) at month 4 (P < 0.001), whereas, among patients vaccinated with SD-IIV4 or RIV4, seroprotection rates were similar to those at baseline. Seroprotection rates were lower against B strains for all vaccines. LIMITATIONS: Because of the use of observational data, bias from unmeasured confounders may exist. Some age subgroups were small in number. Clinical outcome data were not available. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis patients exhibited high seroprotection rates after all 3 influenza vaccines. The seroresponse waned more slowly with HD-IIV3 compared with SD-IIV4 and RIV4 vaccines.

Seroresponse to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines among Maintenance Dialysis Patients over 6 Months.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although most patients receiving maintenance dialysis exhibit initial seroresponse to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, concerns exist regarding the durability of this antibody response. This study evaluated seroresponse over time. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective cohort study included patients on maintenance dialysis, from a midsize national dialysis provider, who received a complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series and had at least one antibody titer checked after full vaccination. IgG spike antibodies (anti-spike IgG) titers were assessed monthly with routine laboratory tests after vaccination; the semiquantitative assay reported a range between zero and ≥20 Index. Descriptive analyses compared trends over time by history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and vaccine type. Time-to-event analyses examined the outcome of loss of seroresponse (anti-spike IgG <1 Index or development of COVID-19). Cox regression adjusted for additional clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Among 1870 patients receiving maintenance dialysis, 1569 had no prior COVID-19. Patients without prior COVID-19 had declining titers over time. Among 443 recipients of BNT162b2 (Pfizer), median (interquartile range) anti-spike IgG titer declined from ≥20 (5.89 to ≥20) in month 1 after full vaccination to 1.96 (0.60-5.88) by month 6. Among 778 recipients of mRNA-1273 (Moderna), anti-spike IgG titer declined from ≥20 (interquartile range, ≥20 to ≥20) in month 1 to 7.99 (2.61 to ≥20) by month 6. The 348 recipients of Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen) had a lower titer response than recipients of an mRNA vaccine over all time periods. In time-to-event analyses, recipients of Ad26.COV2.S and mRNA-1273 had the shortest and longest time to loss of seroresponse, respectively. The maximum titer reached in the first 2 months after full vaccination was associated with durability of the anti-spike IgG seroresponse; patients with anti-spike IgG titer 1-19.99 had a shorter time to loss of seroresponse compared with patients with anti-spike IgG titer ≥20 (hazard ratio, 15.5; 95% confidence interval, 11.7 to 20.7). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients receiving maintenance dialysis, vaccine-induced seroresponse wanes over time across vaccine types. Early titers after full vaccination are associated with the durability of seroresponse.

Kidney Recovery and Death in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Treated With Dialysis: The STOP-COVID Cohort Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury treated with kidney replacement therapy (AKI-KRT) occurs frequently in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We examined the clinical factors that determine kidney recovery in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 4,221 adults not receiving KRT who were admitted to intensive care units at 68 US hospitals with COVID-19 from March 1 to June 22, 2020 (the "ICU cohort"). Among these, 876 developed AKI-KRT after admission to the ICU (the "AKI-KRT subcohort"). EXPOSURE: The ICU cohort was analyzed using AKI severity as the exposure. For the AKI-KRT subcohort, exposures included demographics, comorbidities, initial mode of KRT, and markers of illness severity at the time of KRT initiation. OUTCOME: The outcome for the ICU cohort was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at hospital discharge. A 3-level outcome (death, kidney nonrecovery, and kidney recovery at discharge) was analyzed for the AKI-KRT subcohort. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: The ICU cohort was characterized using descriptive analyses. The AKI-KRT subcohort was characterized with both descriptive analyses and multinomial logistic regression to assess factors associated with kidney nonrecovery while accounting for death. RESULTS: Among a total of 4,221 patients in the ICU cohort, 2,361 (56%) developed AKI, including 876 (21%) who received KRT. More severe AKI was associated with higher mortality. Among survivors, more severe AKI was associated with an increased rate of kidney nonrecovery and lower kidney function at discharge. Among the 876 patients with AKI-KRT, 588 (67%) died, 95 (11%) had kidney nonrecovery, and 193 (22%) had kidney recovery by the time of discharge. The odds of kidney nonrecovery was greater for lower baseline eGFR, with ORs of 2.09 (95% CI, 1.09-4.04), 4.27 (95% CI, 1.99-9.17), and 8.69 (95% CI, 3.07-24.55) for baseline eGFR 31-60, 16-30, ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, compared with eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Oliguria at the time of KRT initiation was also associated with nonrecovery (ORs of 2.10 [95% CI, 1.14-3.88] and 4.02 [95% CI, 1.72-9.39] for patients with 50-499 and <50 mL/d of urine, respectively, compared to ≥500 mL/d of urine). LIMITATIONS: Later recovery events may not have been captured due to lack of postdischarge follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Lower baseline eGFR and reduced urine output at the time of KRT initiation are each strongly and independently associated with kidney nonrecovery among critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving maintenance dialysis represent a high-risk, immune-compromised population with 15%-25% COVID-19 mortality rate who were unrepresented in clinical trials of mRNA vaccines. METHODS: All patients receiving maintenance dialysis who received two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines with antibody test results drawn ≥14 days after the second dose, as documented in the electronic health record through March 18, 2021, were included. Response was on the basis of levels of Ig-G against the receptor binding domain of the S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 spike-antigen (seropositive ≥2 U/L) using an FDA-approved semiquantitative chemiluminescent assay (ADVIA Centaur XP/XPT COV2G). RESULTS: Among 186 patients on dialysis from 30 clinics in eight states tested 23±8 days after receiving two vaccine doses, there were 165 (88.7%) responders with 70% at maximum titer. There was no significant difference between BNT162b2/Pfizer (148 out of 168, 88.1%) and mRNA-1273/Moderna (17 out of 18, 94.4%), P=0.42. All 38 patients with COVID-19 history were responders, with 97% at maximum titer. Among patients without COVID-19, 127 out of 148 (85.8%) were responders, comparable between BNT162b2/Pfizer (113 out of 133) and mRNA-1273/Moderna (14 out of 15) vaccines (85.0% versus 93.3%, P=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients receiving maintenance dialysis responded after two doses of BNT162b2/Pfizer or mRNA-1273/Moderna vaccine, suggesting the short-term development of antispike antibody is good, giving hope that most of these patients who are vulnerable, once immunized, will be protected from COVID-19. Longer-term evaluation is needed to determine antibody titer durability and if booster dose(s) are warranted. Further research to evaluate the approach to patients without a serologic response is needed, including benefits of additional dose(s) or administration of alternate options.

Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving maintenance dialysis represent a high risk, immune-compromised population with 15-25% COVID mortality rate who were unrepresented in clinical trials evaluated for mRNA vaccines' emergency use authorization. METHOD: All patients receiving maintenance dialysis that received two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines with antibody test results drawn ≥14 days after the second dose, as documented in the electronic health record through March 18, 2021 were included. We report seroresponse based on levels of immunoglobulin-G against the receptor binding domain of the S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen (seropositive ≥2) using FDA-approved semi-quantitative chemiluminescent assay (ADVIA Centaur® XP/XPT COV2G). RESULTS: Among 186 dialysis patients from 32 clinics in 8 states tested 23±8 days after receiving 2 vaccine doses, mean age was 68±12 years, with 47% women, 21% Black, 26% residents in long-term care facilities and 97% undergoing in-center hemodialysis. Overall seropositive rate was 165/186 (88.7%) with 70% at maximum titer and with no significant difference in seropositivity between BNT162b2/Pfizer (N=148) and mRNA-1273/Moderna (N=18) vaccines (88.1% vs. 94.4%, p=0.42). Among patients with COVID-19 history, seropositive rate was 38/38 (100%) with 97% at maximum titer. CONCLUSION: Most patients receiving maintenance dialysis were seropositive after two doses of BNT162b2/Pfizer or mRNA-1273/Moderna vaccine. Early evidence suggests that vaccinated dialysis patients with prior COVID-19 develop robust antibody response. These results support an equitable and aggressive vaccination strategy for eligible dialysis patients, regardless of age, sex, race, ethnicity, or disability, to prevent the extremely high morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19 in this high risk population. SIGNIFICANCE: In this retrospective observational evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine response defined by detectable levels of immunoglobulin-G against the receptor binding domain of the S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen of ≥2 in serum of patients receiving maintenance dialysis, 165/186 (88.7%) were found to be seropositive (with 70% at maximum titer) at least 14 days after completing the second dose. No significant differences were observed by race or other subgroup or by vaccine manufacturer. Therefore, an equitable and aggressive vaccination strategy for all eligible maintenance dialysis patients, regardless of age, sex, race, ethnicity, or disability, is warranted to prevent the extremely high morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19 in this high risk population.

Outcomes of palliative care consultation in patients with ESRD who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: The majority of dialysis patients receive aggressive burdensome treatment near the end of life. Currently, we lack interventions to improve end-of-life care (EoLC) for these patients. We examined the association of palliative care consultation with improving EoLC for critically ill patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included patients with ESRD admitted to a large academic center who received CPR either prior to or during their hospital stay. Over 8 years, 17 out of 403 patients received palliative care consultation during their hospital stay; consultations were not standardized in their content. Main outcomes of interest to operationalize better EoLC were: (1) change in code status from full code to do not resuscitate (DNR) and (2) withdrawal from intensive care. RESULTS: Of the patients studied, 60.5% were African-American and 43.2% were female. Demographic differences between those with palliative care consultation and those with usual care were not statistically significant. Palliative care consultation was associated with higher odds of change in code status to DNR (odds ratio 8.10, 95% confidence interval 2.19 - 29.94) and withdrawal from intensive care (odds ratio 8.82, 95% confidence interval 2.69 - 28.91) in patients with ESRD who had received CPR. Palliative care consultation was not associated with any change in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Palliative care consultation needs to be considered for hospitalized ESRD patients with limited expected prognoses as it may reduce aggressive and burdensome therapies at the end of life. Furthermore, primary palliative care skills such as communication and decision-making should be taught to nephrologists to improve EoLC for dialysis patients.

COVID-19 Among US Dialysis Patients: Risk Factors and Outcomes From a National Dialysis Provider.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients receiving maintenance dialysis are a highly vulnerable population due to their comorbidities and circumstances that limit physical distancing during treatment. This study sought to characterize the risk factors for and outcomes following COVID-19 in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Maintenance dialysis patients in clinics of a midsize national dialysis provider that had at least 1 patient who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from February to June 2020. PREDICTORS: Demographics, dialysis characteristics, residence in a congregated setting, comorbid conditions, measurements of frailty, and use of selected medications. OUTCOMES: COVID-19, defined as having a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, and all-cause mortality among those with COVID-19. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Logistic regression analyses conducted to identify clinical characteristics associated with COVID-19 and risk factors associated with mortality among patients following COVID-19. RESULTS: 438 of 7948 (5.5%) maintenance dialysis patients developed COVID-19. Male sex, Black race, in-center dialysis (vs home dialysis), treatment at an urban clinic, residence in a congregate setting, and greater comorbidity were associated with contracting COVID-19. Odds of COVID-19 were 17-fold higher for those residing in a congregated setting (odds ratio [OR], 17.10 [95% CI, 13.51-21.54]). Of the 438 maintenance dialysis patients with COVID-19, 109 (24.9%) died. Older age, heart disease, and markers of frailty were associated with mortality. LIMITATIONS: No distinction was detected between symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positivity, with asymptomatic screening limited by testing capacity during this initial COVID-19 surge period. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 is common among patients receiving maintenance dialysis, particularly those residing in congregate settings. Among maintenance dialysis patients with COVID-19, mortality is high, exceeding 20%.

COVID-19 in dialysis patients: outlasting and outsmarting a pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the care and outcomes of patients treated with dialysis worldwide. In this issue of Kidney International, 3 reports highlight the disproportionately severe impact of COVID-19 on patients on dialysis, noting its high prevalence, particularly among patients receiving in-center dialysis. This likely reflects patients' limited ability to physically distance as well as community exposures, including residence in areas with high rates of infection. Patients on dialysis are at extremely high risk should they develop COVID-19, with short-term mortality of 20% or higher. Accordingly, it is imperative that the kidney community intervenes to reduce the threat of COVID-19 in this vulnerable population by focusing on modifiable factors, including universal masking of patients and staff and enhanced screening, including testing for COVID-19 in the patients who are asymptomatic during times of high local prevalence.